Analysing other students work
In order to gain a wider understanding of what is required to attain the top grades in our coursework, I observed and analysed previous Year 12 students work, at
Video: I felt that the shots used throughout the thriller were appropriate when needed, and showed a range of skills and camera techniques. Some of the shots used at the beginning of the thriller made you ask a lot of questions as to what was going on, adding to the suspense and thrill of the opening. I thought the introduction of the cast was done in a stereotypical, thriller themed way, as they appear in a typewriter style theme, making for a tense and mysterious opening. On this note, I believe that the video techniques were excellent and kept me on the edge of my seat- everything you need in a good thriller. Therefore I would give ‘Twisted Nature’ a Level 4 for Video, as I believe it meets the guidelines of excellent creative use and correct shot transitions, as well as editing and sound.
Research and Planning: Each of the four group members produced sufficient and good quality work, sharing out a good proportion of work. I have highlighted this below, as all members of the group were invloved in many different tasks. When looking at the blog, I get the general gist that the students genuinely enjoyed working on the foundation project, and took time and care in writing and publishing their work. There were many ways used of publishing their work, such as videos, PowerPoints, and Prezi’s and almost all the work was detailed, good quality and relevant to the task. Therefore I would give another Level 4 to ‘Twisted Nature’.
Evaluation: I thought that ‘Twisted Nature’ addressed the evaluation task very well, highlighting their problems and struggles when filming their thriller, such as starting from the beginning mid way through the course. However I felt they dealt very well with this, and went on to produce a very good video and blog. They clearly had the appropriate IT and technological skills throughout the task to produce the final film, as well as a strong understanding of their target audience. Though there was one video where they were clearly unplanned and stuttered through it, I would give them another Level 4 for evaluation.
Overall, I would agree with the Exam Boards final evaluation of an A, due to a very good blog, marketing pages and the final video. The blog post's were all excellent, however I felt some of them were not diverse enough and needed more media products to present their work. Though I enjoyed 'Alice' I found it confusing and I didn't really engage with it. Due to these two negative factors, I would grade the group a mid ranged level 4, as I thought these two points were the only points that hindered the groups excellent coursework.
I enjoyed the thriller opening and I admit it was one of the stronger openings from the year group. I look forward to seeing the groups Advanced Project work in the future.